Sunday, March 29, 2009

A small anti-green manifesto

We live just over a mile from our elementary school. All through kindergarten, we drove TH to school. The bus just seemed too unfamiliar, a territory we couldn't send him into with no map whatosever. We can't walk to school because it is separated from our neighborhood by a four-lane, divided highway. Yep, we live in Texas.

In first grade, we put him on the bus because he could ride with his younger brother Dubya, who attended his final year of preschool in the same building. That proved to have its moments, which included one incident in which a fifth grader accused TH of calling the older child's developmentally disabled brother a "retard." I got into it with the bus driver over that--she had publicly humiliated our son because of this accusation--assuring her that this was a word no one had ever used in front of our son, one he'd never heard, one he still hadn't a clue about even after this incident, one he's never uttered since. She averred that she and "the supervisor" would watch the videotape of the incident and determine whether or not what I was saying about my son--and what my son himself was saying--was true. It was. TH still does not lie. He just doesn't. He can't even pull off a practical joke because he's so utterly incapable of keeping anything to himself, much less dissembling.

In second grade, we were on the bus for two months before much sh** hit the fan, involving demands from other parents that our monstrous bully of a son be removed from the bus, from school, away from their kids because he was beating them and pinching them black and blue and other terrible, awful things. Turns out, those tales from the Bus Brothers Grimm were simply untrue and that in reality, our son was the one being pinched to the point of bruising, being spat upon, snotted on, threatened with an army of "killer space robots." I realize that there is no such thing as "killer space robots," but still.

One offer for "fixing" this problem was that our son could be placed in a seat at the front of the bus, just behind the driver. Given our previous experience with the observational and auditory processing skills of said driver, we declined this proposal. We did so also given that this resolution would have singled our son out when he was patently not the problem.

Lately, we've been getting urgent, rational arguments in the school newsletter from the principal about having children be bus riders. Saves energy. We don't sit in the car line, pumping poison-laden fossil fuels into the air around the school. We (theoretically) don't pollute as much (although I'm skeptical of this--we all know what buses do) if we ride the bus. These are all relevant arguments. And honestly, it'd be a lot easier to stuff him and Dubya onto the bus in the morning and to sit around the house eating all those bon-bons in the afternoon, waiting for the bus to drop them off. But I don't. I spend what is probably a total of almost an hour in the transport to and from school.

And, as I've mentioned before, as much as I want to be environmentally aware, as much as I believe in my grandparents' generational precepts of "waste not, want not," as much as I subscribe to "recycle, reduce, reuse," I cannot sacrifice my son on the altar of the greater good in the name of being green. I'll be as brutally, coldly selfish as any Hummer-driving, McMansion-dwelling, lawn-watering and fertilizing, parking-lot paving, McDonald's consuming, private-jet owning, recyclable paper-tossing, plastic-bag-using, car-idling wastrel in these great United States of ours if it means not subjecting my son to a daily social torture that he still cannot successfully navigate.

So, I still drive him and his two brothers to school in our dusty green Honda minivan every morning, and I pick them up every afternoon. Hey, it's kind of like a little bus, right, one that transports three people to exactly the same place? And it's green, too, just not in that cool environmental way. And there's the added bonus that I have no intention of threatening any of them with imminent harm from my army of killer space robots. Well, at least not on most days.

7 comments:

farmwifetwo said...

We're lucky that the little one rides the special ed bus even though he's capable of riding the other. But since his day starts earlier and ends earlier than his older bro - 15min either way - this is better with his supports.

The elder is first on and first off every day. Plus his driver tolerates NOTHING. She's sat out in front of my house for 10min or more waiting for them to behave on that bus... It's only happened once since he started riding it, they know she won't tolerate it and she's watching/listening all the time.

There's a lot of horror stories out there, so there's no complaints here. But if it wasn't going that well... I too would drive them.

Emily said...

You've got a great driver. Ours are just too overwhelmed or not paying attention or inconsistent, I think. These are the BIG buses, you know? The ones that hold about 40 kids. Just too much for a daily commute for them.

Thanks for commenting.

E

lynnes said...

I hear you! I still have such negative memories of my own years riding the bus that I told dh flat out that I won't let G ride. We drive right past the bus stop on our way to school every morning.

Mama Mara said...

I wonder if it's occurred to your principal that there are reasons for low bus ridership that are unrelated to environmental selfishness? Maybe instead of trying to provoke guilt about our toxic air, he could try to clean up the toxic emotional environment on the bus.

Emily said...

I'm not sure what is going on there, exactly. I hear about bad things happening on the bus all the time. There are supposed to be "bus buddies" and that kind of thing, and for awhile, our bus had assigned seating. I don't know why it's so hard to manage in this district. And of course, I guess, when the principal is sending out those admonitions, he's thinking of families whom he perceives as "coddling" their children or something by not putting them on the bus (?). Dunno. And of course, our problem is families "coddling" in their own way by believing some of the patently unbelievable stories their kids were telling about our son.

The principal is a good guy (and the assistant principal is a good woman), and I'm really just not sure why the buses are better managed. This is the kind of district in which people will not hesitate to complain about wrongs, real and perceived. From our perspective, however, even if there were promises of completely smooth sailing on the buses, we probably wouldn't use them again...I just can't trust that situation.

StatMama said...

The way your son was being treated on the bus is disgusting. No child should be treated like that. It's amazing how bullied children can end up, even by responsible adults! I'd be driving him myself, too, if it were my child. Screw being green by using the bus.

Jen said...

While I think it is important to be environmentally aware, it is also important that your son not be tortured and learn to hate school because of lack of oversight on the bus. It seems to me that by having an aide on every bus (or at least every elementary bus) the school could ensure that the students are being supervised without distracting the driver from the rather important business of actually driving. Yes, it would cost a little more to pay an aide for that extra hour or so a day, but if the school district is serious about encouraging bus riding, they should be willing to make the bus a safe and pleasant environment.