I won't be participating in the Communication Shutdown for autism, scheduled for November 1. The background is that this is an attention-getting maneuver to gain donations for some autism cause. As I understand it, if you donate, you get a CHAPP (charity app) and badge to use that day for your Facebook and Twitter accounts. This app, according to the
FAQ for this initiative, has "quite a few tricks" that include interacting on its own with your accounts and placing your avatar in a mosaic "where you can see yourself next to celebrity supporters." The initiative was begun by an
Australian foundation that focuses on early interventions for children with autism. Looks like a great foundation, from what their Website indicates.
That said, I won't be participating in the shutdown, and here's why:
1. Autistic people do communicate socially. All the time. Regular people just have a hard time figuring out what the autistic people are trying to get across. Indeed, from what I understand, the WWW and its social interaction offshoots that don't require in-person translation have been a boon to autistic people in general.
2. I don't see this as a parallel to autism. The Communication Shutdown site says:
Social communication is one of the biggest challenges for people with autism. By choosing to shutdown your social networks for one day, you will have some idea of what it's like for people with autism who face this challenge every day.
Rachael Harris, a counsellor and supporter, who herself is on the autism spectrum, put it best when she said, "Electing to shutdown social communication mirrors autistic silence. But it also draws attention to the isolation and intense loneliness experienced by those who are impeded from connecting socially with others. The CHAPP is a powerful way to create a sense of empathy towards those on the autism spectrum."
I just disagree with this entire statement. I don't think that shutting down tweeting and facebooking in any way reflects the social challenges my son experiences on a given day, and I suspect that it doesn't reflect the nonverbal experience, either. I don't know what "autistic silence" is, unless it indicates an absence of spoken communication, but I know that autistic people--verbal and nonverbal--communicate all the time and are certainly not silent. The empathy doesn't need to be about their lack of a typical route of communication but about understanding the routes they do use.
3. I can't tell where this money is going or what it's supposed to do once it gets there. The Website information is extremely vague:
This fundraiser is powered by the people. By spreading the word through social networks, we are able to keep costs to a minimum. This ensures the maximum amount possible will go to autism organisations around the world.
As this is the inaugural Communication Shutdown, we are unable to provide a percentage of fundraising costs at this stage. However, we are committed to full transparency regarding costs and these will be published at the conclusion of the campaign.
4. They've got a lot of partners, some of them worthy. So, send your money straight to the
relevant partners.
Why use a third party? That way, you know exactly where your money is going.
5. I don't like gimmicks. I don't like the pink ribbons that don't actually make anyone terribly aware of the realities of breast cancer, and I don't like gimmicks especially that don't seem particularly closely linked to the needs of the target population. I can't see how silencing my own voice helps my son or any autistic person be better understood. It's gimmicky and, I think, shallow. It may be that I'm too enmeshed here and that for people who don't know autism well, it's an attractive entry to understanding it better. I just disagree that this translates into a real understanding of autism.
In conclusion, as my clients often write, I can't think of a good reason to silence my own voice on that day. If others choose to do so or if others are attracted to the cause because of this gimmickry and money--some of it, anyway--is funneled to a useful autism organization, then that's great. But I don't think that silencing my participation in social networks--especially for my participation in
The Thinking Person's Guide to Autism, this blog, and
End the Bullying, is going to do anyone any good. And, as I realize more and more every day, my overflowing desire--the one that's dousing the embers of my
burning mid-life crisis--is to be of some good to someone in the world. Each of us in our own way, that's what we should do. For me, that means continuing to use my words.
30 comments:
At most, it offers the opportunity to some people to give themselves a "pat on the back" for doing something for "those poor people". They don't understand, and don't really want to, they just want to make themselves feel good. Very shallow.
Clay, that may well be what drives a lot of people who otherwise aren't involved with autistic people or aren't autistic themselves. I think the Australian organization behind it is very well intentioned, and it may be that shallow campaigns are what grabs people's attention. If there's not a real vested interest, then there has to be something shiny to attract them.
As "ideas for increasing awareness" go, this one isn't shiny enough. As an idea for raising money, it may just work.
True.
I was at the Dr's today and yet another new nurse told me that I needed more support and I should contact Autism Ontario. I told her I had plenty of support and did not support Autism Ontario.
As you said... people that know nothing, think they know something and Clay's right about the "feel good for those poor people".
My severe ASD child is VERY social. LOVES people. LOVES other children. Doesn't get it right... but like his previous integrated classroom and his new self-contained one, nobody cares and everyone tries. I can gripe about the system, but the children have been wonderful. Then again he's a happy, low behavioural child which IMO makes a difference.
We go Oct 25th to start the ACD assessment/training process. We have words, but we also see a need in him to communicate more. Just b/c he's severe ASD doesn't make him ID nor anti-social.
I also won't be going silent that day; more than half my facebook friends are on the spectrum; why would I shut myself off from communicating with them to show them I support them?
And my children are all social in their own ways (and none of them utilize twitter or facebook); I am sure that they would find this gesture pointless.
Why not have folks go to an autistic individual's blog, read some of the entries, and comment? That would certainly be more supportive and less of a gimmick.
"Why not have folks go to an autistic individual's blog, read some of the entries, and comment?"
Now there's a much shinier idea! But how could the organizers of this make a profit from that?
This is the first I've heard (pun sorta intended) of this, and no ... I won't be going silent either, for all the reasons you mentioned.
This just strikes me as odd.
I will not be going silent either.
I didn't know about this...and likely for all the reasons you mentioned. When I first began reading this, my initial thought was "how does this show 'the world' anything about Autism? Those of us in the middle of it all are well aware of Autism and its effects, and differences between all those on the spectrum. *Our* silence would prove nothing."
I like Clay's idea.
It feels like an oxymoron. The internet has provided some autistic individuals a venue to express their point of view without relying on the difficulties associated with spoken language - so lets support autism by taking that away for a day. Doesn't make much sense to me.
Lynnes, I feel the same way. It's a conduit, a support network, an information exchange...so many things for the autism community.
Liz said:
"I like Clay's idea."
I had an idea? What was it? I think you meant Kim's idea. ;-)
Well said - I could not agree more.
I also will not be going silent. The Internet is what gave me a voice, and I can't think of an artificial way to make someone feel like they have autism for a day. I mean, if they wanted to see what it was like to be hungry they could fast, but you can't change your neurology for a day.
It's extremely, extremely artificial, and communication difficulties for autistic people go way beyond, "OMG I wish I could post to Facebook!" That I can do. What I can't do is work into a conversation that I want to know if someone can do me a favor, or tell when they're getting bored or uncomfortable with the subject I'm currently ranting about. I can't tell when it's my turn to talk or when someone else wants to say something. I can't explain things at all when I'm distracted or upset and will trail off in mid-sentence or struggle to think of both the word I want to use and what I'm currently doing/thinking about at the same time. I think non-autistic people would have a pretty hard time mimicking that.
Bravo, Emily, and all of you who will not be "going silent" on November 1.
+1 to Kim Wombles's idea!
I think the day of silence is a great idea. Forget the concept of a day without autism, I like the idea of all the non stake holders in the autistic community - the gypsies, tramps, and thieves that make good livings taking money from the autistic community will shut up and the autistic community can speak freely without the input of these thugs.
Very well said, Emily. After reading your post, along with Indigo Jo's and Corina Becker's, I've added my voice to the chorus regarding the Communication Shutdown:
http://www.journeyswithautism.com/2010/10/22/speak-up-on-november-1st/
If people want to raise autism awareness, all they have to do is listen to autistic people.
I also won't be going silent.
Indigo Jo here. I've got friends who've got chronic illnesses and are housebound, and I don't want people shutting down on them, whatever the supposed cause. I've launched an "Open Up!" day for 1st November and publicised it on Facebook; everyone's invited.
Open Up! Day on Nov 1st
I'm totally with you on this one, Emily. I don't really understand how this would help people in the autism community. I definitely won't be going silent, either.
I think KWombles idea makes much more sense!
I also will not be taking part in the Communication Shutdown. Instead I plan on speaking out on that day in support of those with autism and their families and friends.
Hi,
My name is Marianne and I am one of the Communication Shutdown Team. I wanted to thank you all for your suggestions and we will certainly take them on board.
We also believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and respect that even though our execution may be different, our intent to help people with autism is the same. By awareness (an often misused term), we are aiming to generate more understanding and acceptance for those on the spectrum. And if you choose to use this day to share your experiences, we would love to pass these on to further educate our supporters. With permission, we could feature your stories on our Facebook, Twitter, on our website and through press releases to the media.
Also, in terms of donations, Communication Shutdown is run by a not-for-profit group and your donation will be directed to a country of your choice. You can see the partners in each country who will receive the funding on our website. We didn’t just want this to be about awareness. We really want to make a difference to worthy groups that unfortunately struggle to get sufficient funding.
And just to clarify a few points, we understand social network sites are important tools for people with autism so we are in no way suggesting that people with autism shutdown and be silent. We simply believe that if NT's (especially those who have no prior engagement with the autism community) go without the social networks they increasingly depend on, they will feel a sense of social disconnection which will encourage a greater understanding and empathy. We also see the badge as a sign of solidarity and hope that when NTs go quiet, autistic voices can be louder on Nov 1.
Thanks for reading and I very much look forward to hearing from you.
I don't see how it increases awareness of what people with autism feel like though. My concern is that it perpetuates the myth that people on the spectrum are silent.
That has been a huge barrier in getting acceptance for my son! My son, like another one of the posters said about hers, is social. He has a beautiful smile and will acknowledge people. But the communication is one-sided: he has to approach you, not the other way around. He's not verbal, and I have no idea sometimes what he's trying to communicate to me. And my husband, also on the spectrum, is ok with people 1:1 too. Internet gaming has provided him a place to be really social on his own terms.
But there's the idea out there that a person with autism can't also communicate, can't also have a smile or be happy or acknowledge people. That's hard to fight against, and "awareness" events like this perpetuate it, IMO.
And finally, I think someone trying to "be like" my husband or son is trite and almost insulting. Everyone on the spectrum is their own person and there are much better ways to try to understand and learn about autism than an NT trying to mimic what they THINK someone with autism is like.
http://marfmom.com
Am not going silent on 1 november or any other day.
Hey, do you care if I add your blog to the list on my Facebook page?
@K, yes, of course.
@Kristina...I'd've bet on that.
@Maya...your sentiments are similar to mine.
@Marianne...thanks for posting, and I wish you luck with your initiative. It doesn't sit well with me, as I've explained, but I respect the motivation and hope that it goes extremely well.
I also decided NOT to be silent. I just doesn't make sense to me. Thanks for being a reasoned voice! I posted about it too today at asdmommy.wordpress.com
I don't like group think, especially stuff like "Paste this into your FB status if you really care about blah, blah, blah!" Going silent on FB is not going to give you one clue about what it is like to have autism. Most people with autism do communicate through their behavior. We have a hard time interpreting what that means. With a lot of hard work, my daughter with autism and aphasia is communicating in her words, actions, facial expressions, and body language.
Very few organizations agree with my unorthodox approach (Charlotte Mason homeschooling, the Association Method, and Relationship Development Intervention). Maybe I should start my own and trump up a way to raise money! LOL
What has helped me as a parent is networking on the Internet. I've been doing that since 1994. So why on earth would I cut off MY source of support?
Post a Comment